Serena Williams, you may have heard, is expected to be her last match at the US Open. Rafael Nadal lost in the fourth round. Novak Djokovic and Roger Federer (more about them later) were also not in the tournament. Those four players dominated, and were the main draw in tennis for decades, collecting a total of 86 Grand Slam singles titles, each with at least 20. And so, the quarter-finals began on Tuesday at Flushing Meadows without any members of that quartet. Presently, it makes sense to ask: is this the end of an era?
Nadal, 36, made a philosophical comment about the subject on Monday after being bounced 6-4, 4-6, 6-4, 6-3 by American Francis Tiafoe, 24, on Monday.
“Some leave, others come and the world goes on. It’s a natural cycle,” said Nadal, who said his wife is pregnant with their first child and so he’s not sure when he’ll play next.
“It’s always been the same. It’s been there for many years; others are coming and we’re leaving. It’s logical.”
People are wondering – and, perhaps, worrying – when someone new will emerge to take over in both women’s tennis and men’s tennis.
This US Open, whether merely symbolic or in fact, offers a glimpse into the current and future states of the sport. Of the 16 singles quarter-finalists in the women’s and men’s categories, 15 have never won such a major championship anywhere (the exception is Poland’s 21-year-old Inga Swietek, who is No. 1 on the WTA Tour and holds two French Open titles). .
According to the US Tennis Association, it is the first time in the professional era, which dates back to 1968, that its Grand Slam event has fewer than at least two previous major title winners at this level.
Looking at the men’s section, none of the four quarterfinalists who played on Wednesday – No. 22 seed Tiafo vs. No. 9 Andrey Rublev, and No. 3 Carlos Alcaraz vs No. 11 Jannik Sinner – haven’t even reached a major semi-final. , Rublev, who will turn 25 next month, is the oldest in the herd.
“It’s good,” said Tiafo, “to see a new era.”
And consider: It’s been almost 20 years since there were zero previous Slam winners in the quarterfinals of a Major. That last happened in 2003 at Wimbledon. Who won the trophy? Federer claimed the first of his 20s, breaking the old men’s mark of 14 set by Pete Sampras, and now Nadal’s 22 and Djokovic’s 21 (as well as Williams’ 23, the most for any tennis player in pro). most) has been left behind. Era).
Federer, 41, hasn’t played since Wimbledon in July 2021 and has had multiple operations on his right knee. He is set to return to an event in Switzerland in October, and says he hopes to play at the All England Club in 2023, but not much is known about what he has left.
There’s no reason to think that 35-year-old Djokovic won’t be a Slam contender for some time – when he might land in the country hosting the tournament, that is. He was not vaccinated against COVID-19, so he was kicked out of Australia in January and barred from entering the United States.
Djokovic and Nadal jointly won the first three major titles of this year and have won 15 of the last 17 titles overall. Add in the other member of the so-called Big Three, Federer, and it’s 20 of the last 22. Take it further, and it’s 63 out of 76. The only other men to have more than one in that period are Andy Murray and Stan Wawrinka, along with three relatives.
Federer’s first win in less than a year came when Sampras won the US Open in what would be his final match.
“Before this generation, we lost another great generation. Obviously, there will be no Rafa or Roger or Serena. We know this. There are always ups and downs. But there were great champions in the past and there will be again.” No. On Tuesday night.
“Great champions go and others come,” Garcia said. “You have to give the young players time to mature and rise to the top of the game. The fans have to be ready for the new generation as well.”
Whether TV executives and tournament ticket-sellers agree, it’s a popular sentiment among current players: Tennis will be fine.
“Unfortunately for all of us,” said Murray, “the game goes on.”