The British sports minister, Nigel Huddleston, recently suggested that for any Russian to play at Wimbledon, there might be a need for “reassurance” about their position on Russia’s invasion of Ukraine: “Absolutely for Russia.” Shouldn’t be allowed or able to fly the flag. We need some possible reassurance that he’s not a supporter of Putin and we’re looking at what requirements we might need and need to get some reassurance along those lines Might be possible.
The All England Lawn and Tennis Club is in discussion with the Sports Minister about the nature of the assurances and whether they will be implemented at Wimbledon.
umpire’s call
Now it seems that Russian players, including top women such as second-place men’s players, Daniil Medvedev and Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova, will be expected to remove the symbols and language associating themselves with the Russian state, and at Wimbledon. Will be committed to participate. “neutral”.
Medvedev has already taken a step in this direction by removing the Russian flag from his social media profile. He also wished for world peace.
However, the general statement of hoping for peace is not the same as taking a position on a war in which one’s country is hostile.
Make no mistake: the Wimbledon tournament – organized by a NATO country – is more than an exhibition of tennis. It is also a demonstration of what Britain considers appropriate, which is unlikely to be diplomacy and accommodation.
Huddleston feels comfortable only with Russian athletes who either oppose or do not support the war, and thus is willing to distance himself from Russian President Vladimir Putin.
in or out?
So deep is the global outrage against Putin that the sport itself has been forced to come out from behind its traditional veil of “neutrality” in political affairs.
As such, sports organizations around the world have taken positions on the participation of both Russian and Belarusian teams and athletes.
One reaction has been the boycott, with the expectation that the withdrawal of Russian teams from world sport is a necessary disgrace to the largest military offensive in Europe since World War II. The same position is taken by swimming, athletics and football.
However, some sporting bodies, such as tennis and biathlon, are allowing Russian and Belarusian individuals to compete as “neutrals”. However, tennis bodies have suspended both Russian and Belarusian players from team-based competitions.
Even the International Olympic Committee, which has long refused to take positions on geopolitical matters, called on sporting bodies and event organizers to “invite or allow the participation of Russian and Belarusian athletes and officials in international competitions”. Inspired not to give”.
In addition, at the recent Beijing Paralympics, several countries refused to participate against Russian teams, resulting in pressure on the organizers to exclude Russian athletes.
Spin or Matter?
The All England Lawn and Tennis Club has the authority to set the entry rules for Wimbledon. It may diplomatically align with the ATP and WTA (the organizing body for men’s and women’s tours), or it may impose an outright ban on Russians.
This is all controversial. Some critics have suggested that the human rights of Russian athletes are being denied, as they are not responsible for military activities in Ukraine.
However, some Russian sports stars – whether voluntarily or otherwise – have made their position known. Many have made public appearances with the letter Z, which has become a symbol of support for Russia’s attack on Ukraine.
Conversely, some Russian sports stars have voiced their disapproval of the war, given this type of dissent a dangerous stance now considered a crime – about 15,000 Russians have already been arrested.
strings attached
Countries opposing the ongoing demolition of Ukraine by Russia have at this time relied on economic sanctions as a major deterrent. Unfortunately, these measures hurt and harm ordinary Russians. Some critics argue that the West’s sanctions are hypocritical given US and allied military interventions in places like Iraq or Israel’s occupation of the Palestinian territories.
Therefore, discussions about Ukraine have focused not only on Russian imperialism and Putin’s fascism, but also on the hypocrisy of the Washington-led “rules-based order”.
The All England Club will reach a decision on whether to ban Russian players or accept them as neutral, in collaboration with the UK sports minister, at a time when Britain is supplying weapons to Ukraine. None of it is editing.
Russian tennis players, if allowed to play, will face heavy scrutiny both on and off the court. Will Medvedev’s victory be Putin’s victory? Will Medvedev’s absence contribute to the anti-war effort?
In the midst of all this are athletes who can become – perhaps unfairly – the target of sanctions. But war is a symbol of injustice.
The author is Associate Professor of Sport Management, University of Technology Sydney